You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think there should be two separate models for constant scatter and variable scatter. This should make it much more transparent. They could both be a subclass of a super LogNormalScatterModel or NormalScatterModel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is definitely a good idea. I'm trying to move away from having too many options within a single constructor, and splitting up separate functionality like this into a subclass is how I'm making the style changes.
Probably the least amount of work in building the subclass would be if you keep the internals fixed, but just use the interpolation on a single control point. Whatever you do, don't change the param_dict keys. So in your subclass, the instance should have a single parameter called 'scatter_model_param1' (I think I remembered that right).
@aphearin
I think there should be two separate models for constant scatter and variable scatter. This should make it much more transparent. They could both be a subclass of a super LogNormalScatterModel or NormalScatterModel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: