Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jackson-databind to 2.10.5.1 (fixes CVE-2020-25649) #463

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2020

Conversation

overheadhunter
Copy link
Contributor

@overheadhunter overheadhunter commented Dec 7, 2020

Bump jackson-databind, as the new version contains a fix for a vulnerability.

While java-jwt itself is probably not affected due to the nature of JWT not being XML-based, we can not say for sure if this can't be exploited in downstream projects.

Changes

Updated library version

References

FasterXML/jackson-databind#2589

Testing

Please describe how this can be tested by reviewers. Be specific about anything not tested and reasons why. If this library has unit and/or integration testing, tests should be added for new functionality and existing tests should complete without errors.

  • This change adds test coverage
  • This change has been tested on the latest version of Java: Merely a smoke test, but I've updated the dependency in my downstream project using JDK 15 and I did not encounter any issues with JWTs

Checklist

@overheadhunter overheadhunter requested a review from a team as a code owner December 7, 2020 17:17
@jimmyjames jimmyjames merged commit 9ee1611 into auth0:master Dec 15, 2020
@jimmyjames
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for this! We're targeting a new release this week to also address #457, so this should be available soon.

@jimmyjames jimmyjames added this to the v3-Next milestone Dec 15, 2020
@jimmyjames jimmyjames modified the milestones: v3-Next, 3.12.0 Dec 18, 2020
@overheadhunter overheadhunter deleted the patch-1 branch March 30, 2021 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants