Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[x/programs] new-type wrapper around u64 #429

Closed
samliok opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

[x/programs] new-type wrapper around u64 #429

samliok opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
@samliok
Labels
lifecycle/stale wasmlanche

Comments

@samliok
Copy link
Contributor

samliok commented Aug 28, 2023 •
edited by richardpringle
Loading

We should be able to pass u64s and u32 across the guest/host boundary.
@samliok samliok self-assigned this Aug 28, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has become stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Adding the lifecycle/frozen label will exempt this issue from future lifecycle events.

@richardpringle richardpringle changed the title new-type wrapper around u64 [x/programs] new-type wrapper around u64 Nov 1, 2023
@samliok samliok mentioned this issue Nov 2, 2023
Merged
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 1, 2024

This issue has become stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Adding the lifecycle/frozen label will exempt this issue from future lifecycle events.

@richardpringle
Copy link
Contributor

I edited the issue description... but I think we can just close this as the signatures have changed a little.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog 🗄️ to Done ✅ in Platform Engineering Group Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@samliok samliok

Labels
lifecycle/stale wasmlanche
Projects
Platform Engineering Group
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@richardpringle @patrick-ogrady @samliok