We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
static { registerProperties(String.class); }
should be
static { registerProperties(ConfigurationProfilePresetCodes.class); }
so that the public static Strings get added to KNOWN_PRESETS
known presets should be validated correctly
n/a
isKnownPreset method returns false for any value, as KNOWN_PRESETS is empty
ConfigurationProfilePresetCodes.isKnownPreset("D0") returns false
No response
2.3.6
21.0.1
unix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
aws-advanced-jdbc-wrapper/wrapper/src/main/java/software/amazon/jdbc/profile/ConfigurationProfilePresetCodes.java
Line 68 in ed0082f
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hello @ivankhoosty
Thanks for reaching out and raising this issue.
Fix #1004 is available on our latest snapshot build. Could you check it out and let us know if the issue still persists?
Thank you!
thanks
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
static {
registerProperties(String.class);
}
should be
static {
registerProperties(ConfigurationProfilePresetCodes.class);
}
so that the public static Strings get added to KNOWN_PRESETS
Expected Behavior
known presets should be validated correctly
What plugins are used? What other connection properties were set?
n/a
Current Behavior
isKnownPreset method returns false for any value, as KNOWN_PRESETS is empty
Reproduction Steps
ConfigurationProfilePresetCodes.isKnownPreset("D0") returns false
Possible Solution
static {
registerProperties(ConfigurationProfilePresetCodes.class);
}
Additional Information/Context
No response
The AWS Advanced JDBC Driver version used
2.3.6
JDK version used
21.0.1
Operating System and version
unix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: