You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar to how an existingLambdaObj? can be supplied for select patterns to bring-your-own Lambda function, I'm seeking the ability to bring-your-own DynamoDB table to this pattern.
Use Case
This feature would be useful if the user already has a DynamoDB table in their account that they would like to retroactively wrap an API around using the pattern OR if they are using another Solutions Constructs pattern that deploys a table, and they would like to hook an API onto that table.
Proposed Solution
Add an existingTableObj? pattern prop, similar to aws-dynamodb-stream-lambda or aws-lambda-dynamodb.
Other
N/A
👋 I may be able to implement this feature request
⚠️ This feature might incur a breaking change
This is a 🚀 Feature Request
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similar to how an existingLambdaObj? can be supplied for select patterns to bring-your-own Lambda function, I'm seeking the ability to bring-your-own DynamoDB table to this pattern.
Use Case
This feature would be useful if the user already has a DynamoDB table in their account that they would like to retroactively wrap an API around using the pattern OR if they are using another Solutions Constructs pattern that deploys a table, and they would like to hook an API onto that table.
Proposed Solution
Add an existingTableObj? pattern prop, similar to aws-dynamodb-stream-lambda or aws-lambda-dynamodb.
Other
N/A
This is a 🚀 Feature Request
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: