Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

July 2020 #67

Open
JLHwung opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 33 comments
Open

July 2020 #67

JLHwung opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 33 comments

Comments

@JLHwung
Copy link

JLHwung commented Jul 20, 2020

https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2020/07.md

@jridgewell jridgewell pinned this issue Jul 20, 2020
@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

nicolo-ribaudo commented Jul 20, 2020

tc39/ecma262#2054 has consensus. I quickly tests it in our REPL and I think we'll have to update our parser.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

nicolo-ribaudo commented Jul 20, 2020

tc39/ecma262#2057 has consensus. It doesn't directly affect us.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

tc39/ecma262#2062 has not consensus. eval?.() is indirect eval, and we should update our implementation.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

nicolo-ribaudo commented Jul 20, 2020

tc39/ecma262#2090 will not change. 09.1_1 and 09e1_1 are still allowed in loose mode (we need to fix our parser).

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

https://tc39.es/proposal-class-static-block/ did not have consensus for Stage 2.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Jul 20, 2020

(note: yet, because it wasn't added to the agenda before the deadline, so there wasn't sufficient time to review)

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

tc39/ecma262#2086 didn't have consensus, it needs to be discussed more.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

tc39/ecma402#471 has consensus.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Promise.any & AggregateError is Stage 4 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

tc39/ecma262#2094 has consensus.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Intl.ListFormat for Stage 4 is Stage 4 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Intl.DateTimeFormat dateStyle/timeStyle is Stage 4 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

WeakRefs is Stage 4 🎉

cleanupSome has been moved back to Stage 2 as a separate proposal.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Logical Assignment Operators to Stage 4 👏

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Numeric Separators are stage 4 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Slice Notation remains at Stage 1.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Import Conditions remains at Stage 2. JSON modules will be moved to a separate proposal.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Intl.Segmenter is now Stage 3 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Array#item() has consensus for Stage 2! 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Ergonomic brand checks for private fields remains at stage 2.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Upsert has been renamed to "emplace" and didn't ask for Stage 3.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

Array.prototype.unique() reaches Stage 1

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

await operations reaches Stage 1

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

jridgewell commented Jul 22, 2020

Number.range remains at Stage 1

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Record&Tuples reaches Stage 2 🎉

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

"Symbols as WeakMap keys" remains at Stage 1.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

JSON.parse source text access reaches Stage 2

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

Arbitrary Module Identifier Strings will be brought back as a needs consensus PR.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

Host hooks for Job callbacks reached consensus

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Async Context does not have consensus for Stage 1.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

Ergonomic brand checks for private fields does not have consensus for Stage 3.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

ResizableArrayBuffer and GrowableSharedArrayBuffer goes to Stage 1 🎉

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

Correction: Number.range remains at Stage 1

@jridgewell jridgewell unpinned this issue Mar 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants