Omitting parentheses

[ghost]

It would be nice you could omit parentheses at function call (just like CoffeScript or Ruby).
CokeScript compiler code is so easy to read! Thank you for your project.

[batiste]

Thanks for your kind words. I am not sure what you mean by omitting parenthesis. You can definitely omit then on the declaration:

def test
    1 + 1

Maybe you mean omitting at call time? It is not impossible to do but it is definitely a more complex process.

[batiste]

Sorry I read again and I have seen you said at call time. This definitely possible to implement but I have personally a strong distaste for omitting then at call time. This is against the explicitness of Python and I find it makes the source code more difficult to read.

I am discovering how CoffeScript works, e.g.

 a = -> 1 + 1
 a # not called here
 a 1 # called: a(1)
 a 1, 2 # called: a(1, 2) 
 a 1 2 # error

It kinda make sense and should be rather easy to implement as the syntax seems to be non contextual to previous function declaration.

[vlad0337187]

@batiste , I think that this is only because you didn't used to it.
I like way it was implemented in CaffeineScript:
https://github.com/caffeine-suite/caffeine-script/wiki/Function-Invocation

Also I'd like to sugges block comment / array / object / string literals from that project.
It's really clean-looking.

[batiste]

@vlad1777d I have used them in Ruby and I have found it makes some piece of code extremely difficult to read.

Explain to me what that does:

a b c

Is it a(b, c) or is it a(b(c)) ? It terribly ambiguous to me and to many people that are used to c-like language a clear loss in readability.

[vlad0337187]

@batiste, in CaffeineScript it's passing arguments to some function:
a(b, c).

If such happens, explicit specifying of parenthesis could help.
Btw, in CaffeineScript there is also block function invocation, like:

a
    b
    c

Looks enough clean:

Line 129, for example.
=)