-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 673
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use build_settings and transitions instead of aspect for cross-compilation #2219
Labels
Milestone
Comments
This was referenced Sep 13, 2019
#1600 can be marked as a duplicate of this issue. |
#2249 is related -- i want to use build settings to avoid the architecture-specific path component of |
This was referenced Mar 16, 2020
jayconrod
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2020
This changes how the goos, goarch, race, msan, static, and pure attributes of go_binary and go_test are implemented. Previously, the go_binary and go_test rules used an aspect on the deps and embed attributes. If any of the mode attributes listed above were set, the aspect declared additional output files and actions to generate them for the specified configuration. This approach had two significant problems. First, the aspect caused the analysis to be performed twice, wasting time and memory even in the case where no cross-compilation was needed. Second, the aspect was not compatible with conditional dependencies specified with select expressions: aspects run on the configured target graph, but the mode attributes could not affect Bazel's configuration. This change deletes the aspect and implements these attributes using a different mechanism: build settings and configuration transitions. A new package is added //go/config with a build setting for each attribute. Most settings are flags that may be set on the command-line. This is an alternative to --feature flags, which will be deprecated and eventually removed. The target //:go_config gathers build settings relevant to Go and provides a GoContextInfo (private). The target //:go_context_data depends on //:go_config, //:stdlib, //:nogo, and a few other standard dependencies. go_binary and go_test rules no longer need to depend on these targets directly. Go rules should now only need to depend on //:go_context_data and the Go toolchain. Unfortunately, neither //:go_context_data nor //:go_config can be part of the toolchain because the toolchain is always analyzed for the execution configuration, not the target configuration. Because of the simplified dependencies, the go_rule function is no longer needed by most rules. This change makes it possible to deprecate it. Fixes #1351 Fixes #2219 Updates #2302
jayconrod
pushed a commit
to jayconrod/rules_go
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2020
This only applies to the master branch, not to current release branches. This is needed for configuration transition support. 1.2.0 (the current minimum) and 2.1.0 (the version before 2.2.0) both have build failures triggered by transitions. For bazel-contrib#2219
jayconrod
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2020
This only applies to the master branch, not to current release branches. This is needed for configuration transition support. 1.2.0 (the current minimum) and 2.1.0 (the version before 2.2.0) both have build failures triggered by transitions. For #2219
jayconrod
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2020
This changes how the goos, goarch, race, msan, static, and pure attributes of go_binary and go_test are implemented. Previously, the go_binary and go_test rules used an aspect on the deps and embed attributes. If any of the mode attributes listed above were set, the aspect declared additional output files and actions to generate them for the specified configuration. This approach had two significant problems. First, the aspect caused the analysis to be performed twice, wasting time and memory even in the case where no cross-compilation was needed. Second, the aspect was not compatible with conditional dependencies specified with select expressions: aspects run on the configured target graph, but the mode attributes could not affect Bazel's configuration. This change deletes the aspect and implements these attributes using a different mechanism: build settings and configuration transitions. A new package is added //go/config with a build setting for each attribute. Most settings are flags that may be set on the command-line. This is an alternative to --feature flags, which will be deprecated and eventually removed. The target //:go_config gathers build settings relevant to Go and provides a GoContextInfo (private). The target //:go_context_data depends on //:go_config, //:stdlib, //:nogo, and a few other standard dependencies. go_binary and go_test rules no longer need to depend on these targets directly. Go rules should now only need to depend on //:go_context_data and the Go toolchain. Unfortunately, neither //:go_context_data nor //:go_config can be part of the toolchain because the toolchain is always analyzed for the execution configuration, not the target configuration. Because of the simplified dependencies, the go_rule function is no longer needed by most rules. This change makes it possible to deprecate it. Fixes #1351 Fixes #2219 Updates #2302
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
rules_go provides two ways to cross-compile code:
--platforms
on the command line. This selects a toolchain whose "default platform" is the target platform. We declare a separatego_toolchain
andtoolchain
for each supported platform (even though the toolchains include the same files) to make this work. This mechanism generally works well.goos
,goarch
and other attributes ongo_binary
andgo_test
. Both rules use an aspect that creates a second graph of actions ifgoos
,goarch
and other attributes are different than the default. This mechanism the the source of a lot of problems. In particular,select
expressions (used for platform-specific dependencies) do not work becauseselect
is applied before analysis.Recent versions of Bazel support Starlark Build Configurations, which give users and Starlark rule authors much greater control over configuration transitions. We should use this functionality to remove the aspect. We may also be able to simplify toolchain declarations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: