Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how to run Oliver Parson's model with ECO or OPLDS (our own dataset)? #2

Open
balajikalluri opened this issue Jan 24, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@balajikalluri
Copy link

Hi Beckel,

After having done the troubleshooting two nights ago. I'd now prepared 1 set of OPL DataSet in format (2015-01-09.mat) very similar to that of yours "Appliance034920150110". Now I would like to use my dataset and run "nilm-eval/Matlab/algorithms/parson_alg" from NILM-EVAL repository.
Could you guide as to where do I start the application demo? Alternatively, if you have a starting point (i.e.guide) to testing the same algo with ECO dataset atleast that could be fine as well.

Thanks & looking forward.

Balaji

@beckel
Copy link
Owner

beckel commented Feb 27, 2015

Hi,

sorry for late response.
Using another data set than the ECO data set should be possible in principle (see HOWTO.txt), but I haven’t tested it so far. It is important to specify the new data set in the config file, but I cannot guarantee that there is no shortcut in the code where it automatically reads the ECO data set instead of the data set provided by the config file. I would in your case do a debug run through the whole process to ensure the new data set is used everywhere.

If you want to use your algorithm with the ECO data set you just need to store the algorithm in Matlab/algorithms and specify the corresponding algorithm in the config file (algorithm: ‘youralgorithm’). This should work, I’ve tested it a couple of times.

Christian

On 24 Jan 2015, at 06:34, K M Balaji [email protected] wrote:

Hi Beckel,

After having done the troubleshooting two nights ago. I'd now prepared 1 set of OPL DataSet in format (2015-01-09.mat) very similar to that of yours "Appliance034920150110". Now I could like to use my dataset and run "nilm-eval/Matlab/algorithms/parson_alg" from your NILM-EVAL repository.
Could you guide to as to where do I start the application demo? Alternatively, if you have a starting point (i.e.guide) to testing the same algo with ECO dataset atleast that could be fine as well.

Thanks & looking forward.

Balaji


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@balajikalluri
Copy link
Author

Thanks Christian. I will try to do that when I am progressing through that stage. Will get in touch as and when needed.

Balaji

'Love All, Serve All'
"Help Ever, Hurt Never"

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:34 PM, beckel [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

sorry for late response.
Using another data set than the ECO data set should be possible in principle (see HOWTO.txt), but I haven’t tested it so far. It is important to specify the new data set in the config file, but I cannot guarantee that there is no shortcut in the code where it automatically reads the ECO data set instead of the data set provided by the config file. I would in your case do a debug run through the whole process to ensure the new data set is used everywhere.

If you want to use your algorithm with the ECO data set you just need to store the algorithm in Matlab/algorithms and specify the corresponding algorithm in the config file (algorithm: ‘youralgorithm’). This should work, I’ve tested it a couple of times.

Christian

On 24 Jan 2015, at 06:34, K M Balaji [email protected] wrote:

Hi Beckel,

After having done the troubleshooting two nights ago. I'd now prepared 1 set of OPL DataSet in format (2015-01-09.mat) very similar to that of yours "Appliance034920150110". Now I could like to use my dataset and run "nilm-eval/Matlab/algorithms/parson_alg" from your NILM-EVAL repository.
Could you guide to as to where do I start the application demo? Alternatively, if you have a starting point (i.e.guide) to testing the same algo with ECO dataset atleast that could be fine as well.

Thanks & looking forward.

Balaji


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants