You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not really an issue, I am just trying to understand what Precision@K and MAP@K values are considered good enough?
I have tried tuning the hyper-parameters and experimented with cleaning my data (removing user-item interactions that are really low and very high) but the precision@10 never seem to go beyond 0.23 and MAP@10 - 0.15
I understand "what is good" depends on my scenario, but is it possible to achieve higher results for Precision@K / MAP@K?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not really an issue, I am just trying to understand what Precision@K and MAP@K values are considered good enough?
I have tried tuning the hyper-parameters and experimented with cleaning my data (removing user-item interactions that are really low and very high) but the precision@10 never seem to go beyond 0.23 and MAP@10 - 0.15
I understand "what is good" depends on my scenario, but is it possible to achieve higher results for Precision@K / MAP@K?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: