-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update FF field names to match #10670 #506
Conversation
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
'debug[0]':'Setpoint Delta Impl [Roll]', | ||
'debug[1]':'Boost Amount', | ||
'debug[2]':'Boost Amount Clip [Roll]', | ||
'debug[3]':'Clip', | ||
'debug[0]':'Raw FF Derivative [Roll]', | ||
'debug[1]':'Cleaned FF Derivative ', | ||
'debug[2]':'Cleaned Boost Amount [Roll]', | ||
'debug[3]':'Duplicate Marker', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here we have the habitual nightmare of the blackbox and configurator... we need to maintain backward compatibility :(
I don't remember to have done this before for the debug names, so I can't point to a sample at this moment... but if the "old" name is correct for old logs, then we can't simply rename them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see.
The current names aren't quite right in a lot of debug cases. In this case the existing names aren't right for 4.2 either :-)
If its tough to provide a compatibility solution for the debugs, could we make 'releases' that are correct for a given version of the software, in terms of debug names and waveform scaling ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I doubt. A lot of people have different quads some of them in different versions, and expect all to be working... @mikeller what do you think in this case?
I cant try to look at the code this week to see if we can make this conditional depending on the version.
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within a week. |
I've tried a number of things to get blackbox to respond to a change in the names of fields when the debug name hasn't changed. |
Can be closed since #514 provided version control for debug names and included fixing the feedforward names. Thanks @McGiverGim |
Update Blackbox Log viewer field names to reflect the debug changes in #10670