You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Long term I think it would make sense to replace the SSE2 implementation with packed_simd. The main reason being that packed_simd will support multiple platforms meaning glam won't need to implement support for other platforms itself.
I always want glam to build on stable so until packed_simd is stabilised, any work on it should live in a branch.
I would probably keep the scalar-math implementation in glam so it can be built without SIMD or custom alignment of types.
There are a few other questions around packed_simd:
It's in the nursery but development doesn't look very active, is there a plan to get it to stable?
I what gets generated on platforms that packed_simd doesn't support?
Long term I think it would make sense to replace the SSE2 implementation with
packed_simd
. The main reason being thatpacked_simd
will support multiple platforms meaningglam
won't need to implement support for other platforms itself.I always want
glam
to build on stable so untilpacked_simd
is stabilised, any work on it should live in a branch.I would probably keep the
scalar-math
implementation inglam
so it can be built without SIMD or custom alignment of types.There are a few other questions around
packed_simd
:packed_simd
doesn't support?https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/packed_simd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: