-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix/be/server-index-cleanup #1057
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Server/index.js (2)
Line range hint
68-76
: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's decouple these services!Adding services directly to the request object creates tight coupling. Consider using a dependency injection container to manage these services more effectively.
Consider using a DI container like
awilix
:import { createContainer, asClass, asValue } from 'awilix'; const container = createContainer(); container.register({ db: asValue(db), jobQueue: asValue(jobQueue), emailService: asValue(emailService), settingsService: asValue(settingsService) }); app.use((req, res, next) => { req.container = container; next(); });
158-161
: There's vomit on his sweater: Let's clean up this error handling!The error logging could be more informative by including additional context and stack traces.
Enhance the error logging:
logger.error(error.message, { service: SERVICE_NAME, + stack: error.stack, + timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), + startupPhase: 'initialization' });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- Server/configs/db.js (0 hunks)
- Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js (3 hunks)
- Server/index.js (5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Server/configs/db.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Server/index.js (1)
142-142
:⚠️ Potential issueArms are heavy: Let's make the cleanup more steady!
The cleanup process needs improvement:
- Replace console.log with logger
- Add timeout for graceful shutdown
Here's how to enhance it:
-console.log("Already cleaning up"); +logger.info("Cleanup already in progress", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); -console.log("Shutting down gracefully"); +logger.info("Initiating graceful shutdown", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); +const SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT = 10000; // 10 seconds +const shutdownTimer = setTimeout(() => { + logger.error("Forced shutdown due to timeout", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); + process.exit(1); +}, SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT); await jobQueue.obliterate(); await db.disconnect(); +clearTimeout(shutdownTimer); -console.log("Finished cleanup"); +logger.info("Cleanup completed successfully", { service: SERVICE_NAME });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Server/db/mongo/MongoDB.js (2)
4-5
: Yo, these logging improvements are straight fire! 🔥The addition of structured logging and the SERVICE_NAME constant brings better observability to the MongoDB operations. This is a solid improvement over console.log statements.
169-169
: Clean export addition, no cap! 💯The disconnect method is properly exported, maintaining consistency with the existing export structure.
@@ -51,31 +50,11 @@ const __dirname = path.dirname(__filename); | |||
const openApiSpec = JSON.parse( | |||
fs.readFileSync(path.join(__dirname, "openapi.json"), "utf8") | |||
); | |||
|
|||
const PORT = 5000; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yo dawg, let's make that PORT configurable!
Instead of hardcoding the port number, we should make it configurable through environment variables. This makes the app more flexible across different environments.
Here's a better way to handle it:
-const PORT = 5000;
+const PORT = process.env.PORT || 5000;
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const PORT = 5000; | |
const PORT = process.env.PORT || 5000; |
await db.connect(); | ||
app.listen(PORT, () => { | ||
console.log(`server started on port:${PORT}`); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Knees weak: Server startup sequence needs strengthening!
Two issues here:
- Using
console.log
instead of thelogger
utility - Server starts before all services are initialized (emailService, networkService, etc.)
Fix the logging and sequence:
await db.connect();
-app.listen(PORT, () => {
- console.log(`server started on port:${PORT}`);
-});
const settingsService = new SettingsService(AppSettings);
await settingsService.loadSettings();
// ... other service initialization ...
+app.listen(PORT, () => {
+ logger.info(`Server started on port:${PORT}`, { service: SERVICE_NAME });
+});
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
@@ -17,14 +19,30 @@ const connect = async () => { | |||
appSettings = new AppSettings({}); | |||
await appSettings.save(); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
console.log("Connected to MongoDB"); | |||
logger.info("Connected to MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME, method: "connect" }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, we need to beef up this error handling! 💪
While the structured logging is dope, we could make this even better:
- Add connection string validation
- Include more error context in the logs
Here's how we can level up this code:
const connect = async () => {
try {
const connectionString =
process.env.DB_CONNECTION_STRING || "mongodb://localhost:27017/uptime_db";
+ if (!connectionString.startsWith('mongodb://') && !connectionString.startsWith('mongodb+srv://')) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid MongoDB connection string');
+ }
await mongoose.connect(connectionString);
// If there are no AppSettings, create one
let appSettings = await AppSettings.find();
if (appSettings.length === 0) {
appSettings = new AppSettings({});
await appSettings.save();
}
logger.info("Connected to MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME, method: "connect" });
} catch (error) {
logger.error("failed to connect to MongoDB", {
service: SERVICE_NAME,
method: "connect",
+ error: error.message,
+ stack: error.stack
});
throw error;
}
};
Also applies to: 24-27
const disconnect = async () => { | ||
try { | ||
logger.info("Disconnecting from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); | ||
await mongoose.disconnect(); | ||
logger.info("Disconnected from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); | ||
return; | ||
} catch (error) { | ||
logger.error("failed to disconnect from MongoDB", { | ||
service: SERVICE_NAME, | ||
errorMsg: error.message, | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's make this disconnect method bulletproof! 🍝
The disconnect method is looking clean, but we could make it even more robust with a few tweaks:
- Return success/failure status
- Add timeout handling
Here's the improved version:
const disconnect = async () => {
try {
logger.info("Disconnecting from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME });
- await mongoose.disconnect();
+ await Promise.race([
+ mongoose.disconnect(),
+ new Promise((_, reject) =>
+ setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Disconnect timeout')), 5000)
+ )
+ ]);
logger.info("Disconnected from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME });
- return;
+ return true;
} catch (error) {
logger.error("failed to disconnect from MongoDB", {
service: SERVICE_NAME,
errorMsg: error.message,
+ stack: error.stack
});
+ return false;
}
};
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const disconnect = async () => { | |
try { | |
logger.info("Disconnecting from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); | |
await mongoose.disconnect(); | |
logger.info("Disconnected from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); | |
return; | |
} catch (error) { | |
logger.error("failed to disconnect from MongoDB", { | |
service: SERVICE_NAME, | |
errorMsg: error.message, | |
}); | |
} | |
}; | |
const disconnect = async () => { | |
try { | |
logger.info("Disconnecting from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); | |
await Promise.race([ | |
mongoose.disconnect(), | |
new Promise((_, reject) => | |
setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Disconnect timeout')), 5000) | |
) | |
]); | |
logger.info("Disconnected from MongoDB", { service: SERVICE_NAME }); | |
return true; | |
} catch (error) { | |
logger.error("failed to disconnect from MongoDB", { | |
service: SERVICE_NAME, | |
errorMsg: error.message, | |
stack: error.stack | |
}); | |
return false; | |
} | |
}; |
This PR cleans up the main server file
configs
folder to index.js