feat: fe sidebar restructure #1226
Merged
+4
−12
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to two components: the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Sidebar
participant PageSpeed
User->>Sidebar: Open Sidebar
Sidebar->>User: Display Menu Items
User->>PageSpeed: Navigate to PageSpeed
PageSpeed->>User: Display Page Speed Monitors
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx (4)
50-52: Yo dawg, let's talk about that menu order! 🍝The menu items have been successfully moved to the top level, but consider grouping related items together. For example, "Infrastructure" might be more logically placed after "Monitors" since they're both monitoring-related features.
{ name: "Monitors", path: "monitors", icon: <Monitors /> }, +{ name: "Infrastructure", path: "infrastructure", icon: <Integrations /> }, { name: "Pagespeed", path: "pagespeed", icon: <PageSpeed /> }, -{ name: "Infrastructure", path: "infrastructure", icon: <Integrations /> },
Line range hint
89-93: Mom's spaghetti alert! PATH_MAP needs updating! 🍝The PATH_MAP still references "Dashboard" as the parent for monitors, pagespeed, and infrastructure, but this parent no longer exists in the menu structure. This could cause unexpected behavior with the sidebar's open state management.
const PATH_MAP = { - monitors: "Dashboard", - pagespeed: "Dashboard", - infrastructure: "Dashboard", account: "Account", settings: "Other", };
Line range hint
108-108: Cleanup time! Remove that stale state! 🧹The initial state still includes "Dashboard" in the open state object, but this category no longer exists in the menu structure.
-const [open, setOpen] = useState({ Dashboard: false, Account: false, Other: false }); +const [open, setOpen] = useState({ Account: false, Other: false });
Yo, we've got some leftover spaghetti code! 🍝
There are still several references to "Dashboard" that need to be cleaned up:
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx:
- The
PATH_MAPobject still maps routes to "Dashboard"- The initial state of
openincludesDashboard: false- There's an unused import of
Dashboardfrom iconsClient/src/Pages/NotFound/index.jsx:
- Contains text "Go to the main dashboard"
Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsxandClient/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/empty.jsx:
- Contains UI text references to "dashboard"
These references should be updated to maintain consistency with the removal of the Dashboard category.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-499: Let's make sure we didn't miss any spaghetti! 🍝Let's verify that all references to the removed "Dashboard" category have been cleaned up throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to "Dashboard" that might need cleanup rg -i "dashboard" --type jsx --type jsLength of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more reliable search for Dashboard references rg -l -g '*.{js,jsx}' -i 'dashboard' # Let's also check for specific Dashboard-related patterns in the codebase ast-grep --pattern 'name: "Dashboard"' # And check the PATH_MAP object specifically rg 'PATH_MAP.*=.*{[^}]*Dashboard[^}]*}'Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the specific files that mention dashboard rg -A 5 -B 5 -i 'dashboard' Client/src/Pages/Settings/index.jsx rg -A 5 -B 5 -i 'dashboard' Client/src/Pages/NotFound/index.jsx rg -A 5 -B 5 -i 'dashboard' Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/empty.jsx rg -A 5 -B 5 -i 'dashboard' Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx # Let's also try a simpler PATH_MAP search rg 'PATH_MAP' Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsxLength of output: 2946
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/index.jsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/index.jsx (1)
84-84: Yo, this Stack alignment change is straight fire! 🔥
The change from space-between to end alignment makes perfect sense now that the greeting is gone. It follows the common pattern of having action buttons aligned to the right.
Let's make sure we didn't miss any greeting references:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, this Stack alignment change is clean and verified! 🎯
After checking the whole file like mom's spaghetti recipe, there's no trace of any Greeting component - it's been completely cleaned up! The justifyContent="end" is perfect since we've only got that Create button chilling on the right side. Everything's aligned just the way it should be, no spaghetti code in sight!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to Greeting component
rg -i "greeting" ./Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed
Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire file content to understand the context better
cat ./Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/index.jsx
# Also search for any imports from components directory that might include Greeting
rg -l "import.*from.*components" ./Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/index.jsx
Length of output: 3508
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR aims to enhance user navigation by restructuring the frontend sidebar. The primary changes include removing the "Dashboards" top-level menu item and promoting its submenus (Monitors, Pagespeed, and Infrastructure) to the top level. Additionally, the greeting from the PageSpeed page is removed to simplify the UI.
- Key components modified: Sidebar component and PageSpeed page component.
- Impact assessment: The changes affect the navigation structure and user experience, making key features more accessible.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The navigation restructure impacts all users interacting with the sidebar, potentially affecting user workflows and productivity.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: The navigation hierarchy is flattened by removing a top-level menu item and promoting its submenus.
- Component interactions: The Sidebar component interacts with various navigation items, and the PageSpeed component interacts with user interface elements.
- Integration points: The Sidebar component integrates with the overall navigation structure, while the PageSpeed component integrates with UI elements and user interactions.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
Client/src/Components/Sidebar/index.jsx - Sidebar Component
- Submitted PR Code:
const menu = [ - { - name: "Dashboard", - icon: <Dashboard />, - nested: [ - { name: "Monitors", path: "monitors", icon: <Monitors /> }, - { name: "Pagespeed", path: "pagespeed", icon: <PageSpeed /> }, - { name: "Infrastructure", path: "infrastructure", icon: <Integrations /> }, - ], - }, + { name: "Monitors", path: "monitors", icon: <Monitors /> }, + { name: "Pagespeed", path: "pagespeed", icon: <PageSpeed /> }, + { name: "Infrastructure", path: "infrastructure", icon: <Integrations /> }, { name: "Incidents", path: "incidents", icon: <Incidents /> }, // { name: "Status pages", path: "status", icon: <StatusPages /> }, { name: "Maintenance", path: "maintenance", icon: <Maintenance /> }, // { name: "Integrations", path: "integrations", icon: <Integrations /> }, { name: "Account", icon: <Account />, nested: [ { name: "Profile", path: "account/profile", icon: <UserSvg /> }, { name: "Password", path: "account/password", icon: <LockSvg /> },
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The current logic removes the "Dashboard" menu item and promotes its submenus to the top level. This change simplifies the navigation but may affect users who are accustomed to the previous structure. There is a risk that users might find the new structure confusing if they are used to the old hierarchy.
- Edge cases and error handling: No immediate edge cases or error handling concerns are introduced by this change. However, it is important to consider how users will adapt to the new structure, especially if they rely on muscle memory for navigation.
- Cross-component impact : The change impacts the navigation structure, which affects all users interacting with the sidebar. This could potentially affect user workflows and productivity.
- Business logic considerations : The business logic remains intact, but the user experience is improved by making key features more accessible. However, there might be a temporary dip in user satisfaction as they adjust to the new layout.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const menu = [ { name: "Monitors", path: "monitors", icon: <Monitors />, tooltip: "Monitor your servers and services" }, { name: "Pagespeed", path: "pagespeed", icon: <PageSpeed />, tooltip: "Analyze page speed performance" }, { name: "Infrastructure", path: "infrastructure", icon: <Integrations />, tooltip: "Manage infrastructure integrations" }, { name: "Incidents", path: "incidents", icon: <Incidents /> }, // { name: "Status pages", path: "status", icon: <StatusPages /> }, { name: "Maintenance", path: "maintenance", icon: <Maintenance /> }, // { name: "Integrations", path: "integrations", icon: <Integrations /> }, { name: "Account", icon: <Account />, nested: [ { name: "Profile", path: "account/profile", icon: <UserSvg /> }, { name: "Password", path: "account/password", icon: <LockSvg /> },
- **Improvement rationale **
- Technical benefits: Adding tooltips to the new top-level menu items will help users understand the change and adapt more quickly. This can mitigate the risk of user confusion and improve the overall user experience.
- Business value: Enhanced user experience leads to higher user satisfaction and productivity, which is crucial for the success of the monitoring tool.
- Risk assessment: The risk of user confusion is mitigated by providing clear tooltips, making the transition smoother.
Client/src/Pages/PageSpeed/index.jsx - PageSpeed Component
- Submitted PR Code:
import { Box, Button, Grid, Stack } from "@mui/material"; import { useEffect, useState } from "react"; import { useTheme } from "@emotion/react"; import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux"; import { getPageSpeedByTeamId } from "../../Features/PageSpeedMonitor/pageSpeedMonitorSlice"; import Fallback from "../../Components/Fallback"; import "./index.css"; import { useNavigate } from "react-router"; import PropTypes from "prop-types"; import Breadcrumbs from "../../Components/Breadcrumbs"; -import Greeting from "../../Utils/greeting"; import SkeletonLayout from "./skeleton"; import Card from "./card"; import { networkService } from "../../main"; const PageSpeed = ({ isAdmin }) => { const theme = useTheme(); const dispatch = useDispatch(); const navigate = useNavigate(); const { user, authToken } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); @@ -75,25 +74,24 @@ }} > {isActuallyLoading ? ( <SkeletonLayout /> ) : monitors?.length !== 0 ? ( <Box> <Box mb={theme.spacing(12)}> <Breadcrumbs list={[{ name: `pagespeed`, path: "/pagespeed" }]} /> <Stack direction="row" - justifyContent="space-between" + justifyContent="end" alignItems="center" mt={theme.spacing(5)} > - <Greeting type="pagespeed" /> {isAdmin && ( <Button variant="contained" color="primary" onClick={() => navigate("/pagespeed/create")} sx={{ whiteSpace: "nowrap" }} > Create new </Button> )}
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The removal of the greeting component simplifies the UI but may affect the user experience for those who rely on the greeting for context. Users might miss the personalized touch that the greeting provided.
- Edge cases and error handling: No immediate edge cases or error handling concerns are introduced by this change. However, it is important to consider how the removal of the greeting might affect users who are accustomed to seeing it.
- Cross-component impact : The change impacts the PageSpeed page layout, which may affect user interaction. This could potentially affect user workflows and productivity.
- Business logic considerations : The business logic remains intact, but the user experience is slightly altered. The removal of the greeting might make the page feel less personalized.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
import { Box, Button, Grid, Stack } from "@mui/material"; import { useEffect, useState } from "react"; import { useTheme } from "@emotion/react"; import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux"; import { getPageSpeedByTeamId } from "../../Features/PageSpeedMonitor/pageSpeedMonitorSlice"; import Fallback from "../../Components/Fallback"; import "./index.css"; import { useNavigate } from "react-router"; import PropTypes from "prop-types"; import Breadcrumbs from "../../Components/Breadcrumbs"; import SkeletonLayout from "./skeleton"; import Card from "./card"; import { networkService } from "../../main"; const PageSpeed = ({ isAdmin }) => { const theme = useTheme(); const dispatch = useDispatch(); const navigate = useNavigate(); const { user, authToken } = useSelector((state) => state.auth); @@ -75,25 +74,24 @@ }} > {isActuallyLoading ? ( <SkeletonLayout /> ) : monitors?.length !== 0 ? ( <Box> <Box mb={theme.spacing(12)}> <Breadcrumbs list={[{ name: `pagespeed`, path: "/pagespeed" }]} /> <Stack direction="row" justifyContent="end" alignItems="center" mt={theme.spacing(5)} > {isAdmin && ( <Button variant="contained" color="primary" onClick={() => navigate("/pagespeed/create")} sx={{ whiteSpace: "nowrap" }} > Create new </Button> )}
- **Improvement rationale **
- Technical benefits: Removing the greeting component simplifies the UI and reduces the amount of code that needs to be maintained. This can improve performance and reduce the risk of bugs.
- Business value: A simpler UI can improve user focus and productivity, but it is important to ensure that the removal of the greeting does not negatively impact user satisfaction.
- Risk assessment: The risk of user dissatisfaction is mitigated by ensuring that the removal of the greeting does not affect the core functionality of the PageSpeed page.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes are well-organized and modular, affecting only the specific components related to the sidebar and PageSpeed page.
- Design patterns usage: The changes adhere to the existing design patterns, maintaining consistency.
- Error handling approach: No new exception scenarios are introduced. The existing error handling mechanisms remain intact.
- Resource management: No significant impact on resource utilization. The changes do not introduce new resource management concerns.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
Critical Issues
- None identified.
-
Warnings
- Potential risks: The removal of the greeting component might affect users who rely on it for context. Additionally, the restructuring of the sidebar might temporarily confuse users accustomed to the old hierarchy.
- Suggested improvements: Consider adding a tooltip or brief description for the newly promoted top-level menu items to help users understand the change.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes are straightforward and easy to maintain.
- Readability issues: The code is readable and well-structured.
- Performance bottlenecks: No new performance bottlenecks are introduced.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: No changes to authentication or authorization mechanisms.
- Data handling concerns: No new data handling concerns are introduced.
- Input validation: No changes to input validation mechanisms.
- Security best practices: The changes adhere to security best practices.
- Potential security risks: No new security risks are introduced.
- Mitigation strategies: No new mitigation strategies are required.
- Security testing requirements: Ensure that the existing security testing covers the modified components.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: Ensure that unit tests cover the new navigation structure and the removal of the greeting component.
- Integration test requirements: Test the integration of the sidebar with other components to ensure smooth navigation.
- Edge cases coverage: Validate that the changes do not introduce new edge cases.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example unit test for Sidebar component
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import Sidebar from '../../Components/Sidebar/index.jsx';
test('renders new top-level menu items', () => {
render(<Sidebar />);
expect(screen.getByText('Monitors')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('Pagespeed')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('Infrastructure')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
// Example unit test for PageSpeed component
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import PageSpeed from '../../Pages/PageSpeed/index.jsx';
test('renders PageSpeed component without greeting', () => {
render(<PageSpeed isAdmin={true} />);
expect(screen.queryByText('Greeting')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});- Coverage improvements: Ensure that the existing test coverage is maintained.
- Performance testing needs: No new performance testing needs are identified.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: Update the documentation to reflect the changes in the navigation structure and the removal of the greeting component.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: The changes are straightforward and easy to maintain.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: No new technical debt is introduced. Ensure that the modified components are monitored for any potential issues.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes affect the user interface and navigation structure. Ensure that the deployment is thoroughly tested to avoid any disruptions.
- Key operational considerations: Monitor user feedback post-deployment to address any concerns related to the navigation changes.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Consider adding a tooltip or brief description for the newly promoted top-level menu items to help users understand the change.
- Ensure that the removal of the greeting component does not negatively impact user satisfaction.
- Update the documentation to reflect the changes in the navigation structure and the removal of the greeting component.
- Monitor user feedback post-deployment to address any concerns related to the navigation changes.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: Continuously monitor user feedback to make further improvements to the navigation structure.
- Business capability evolution: Enhance user experience by making key features more accessible and intuitive.
- System integration impacts: Ensure that the navigation changes do not affect other integrated systems or components.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
Closed
This was referenced Dec 3, 2024
Closed
Closed
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR removes the "Dashboards" top level menu item and moves the previous submenus Monitors, Pagespeed, and Infrastructure to the top level of the menu.