You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
TL;DR: PR #53 seems to be based on a wrong assumption. In fact,simple_segregated_storage in its present form is fundamentally uncapable of handling mixed partition sizes, and cannot be "fixed" to allow that handling without a major change of the implementation. The linked-to Example 4.1, which was a starting point for the "fix", also looks simply wrong and so does the fix itself.
There is a new PR here, which contains further details, including
the demonstration of the regression (the 1st commit of the new PR),
the reverting of the code change (2nd commit of the new PR) and
TL;DR: PR #53 seems to be based on a wrong assumption. In fact,
simple_segregated_storage
in its present form is fundamentally uncapable of handling mixed partition sizes, and cannot be "fixed" to allow that handling without a major change of the implementation. The linked-to Example 4.1, which was a starting point for the "fix", also looks simply wrong and so does the fix itself.There is a new PR here, which contains further details, including
malloc_n
Behavior #53, which are believed to be incorrect.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: