You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, congratulations on completing such a work, but I am confused about the results in the technical report.
The reported results are referred to as "zero-shot evaluation of RadFM", however, the vqa-rad dataset exists in your training dataset, isn't it somewhat paradoxical that? Or did you do something with the dataset or did I misinterpret the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your question. Here our “zero-shot” setting is more referred as a prompting method, distinguished with few-shot, CoT and so on, following FLAN https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.13688. In other word, "zero-shot" here is not directly linked with any domain shift.
We talk about the transferring ability on unseen tasks in section "Generalization to Unseen Classes in PadChest" which may be more aligned with your understanding for "zero-shot".
First of all, congratulations on completing such a work, but I am confused about the results in the technical report.
The reported results are referred to as "zero-shot evaluation of RadFM", however, the vqa-rad dataset exists in your training dataset, isn't it somewhat paradoxical that? Or did you do something with the dataset or did I misinterpret the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: