Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

host-device: Support IPAM for DPDK device #578

Closed
lynic opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #642
Closed

host-device: Support IPAM for DPDK device #578

lynic opened this issue Jan 29, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #642

Comments

@lynic
Copy link

lynic commented Jan 29, 2021

Hi team, host-device plugin support DPDK device since #490 merged, would be good to also support IPAM for DPDK device just like what SRIOV cni do. k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-cni#142

@martinkennelly
Copy link

I like this idea. We use SRIOV CNI on baremetal to provide DPDK apps with an IP address via downward API however we depend on host-device plugin for now in a VM environment. If we got a general community acceptance on needing this feature, we could work on it.

@squeed
Copy link
Member

squeed commented Mar 10, 2021

What do you foresee IPAM looking like? DPDK devices are special, since we can't actually configure the IP address on them.

Maybe it's time for a separate "dpdk" CNI plugin?

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Contributor

@squeed in dpdk case, yes, cni doesn't configure ip address on the interface, but it can still assign ip address from ipam module and pass back in result (this is what we intend to fix it here), this would help meta cni's like multus to build network status annotation for device with ip address. this is later mounted into pod container via downward APIs and dpdk application use this ip address in the user space.
can we work on a PR to address this ?

@wjun
Copy link

wjun commented Aug 24, 2021

Echo @pperiyasamy @squeed We really would like this gets supported in host-device to make it full feature support for sriov in virtual environment.

@dcbw dcbw closed this as completed in #642 Dec 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants