Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[CI] wiredep marked as unmaintained #550

Closed
emilevauge opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

[CI] wiredep marked as unmaintained #550

emilevauge opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels
kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. status/5-frozen-due-to-age

Comments

@emilevauge
Copy link
Member

It appears that wiredep as been marked as unmaintained and that leads dependencyci to fail.

@ldez any advice?
@ldez
Copy link
Contributor

ldez commented Jul 21, 2016

Currently Wiredep is not clearly flag as unmaintained.

If we must change, we can switch to gulp-inject or others.

@emilevauge
Copy link
Member Author

Currently Wiredep is not clearly flag as unmaintained.

sure?

@ldez
Copy link
Contributor

ldez commented Jul 21, 2016

For me the truth is in NPM https://www.npmjs.com/package/wiredep

@ldez
Copy link
Contributor

ldez commented Jul 21, 2016 •
edited
Loading

The better and the quickest way to migrate seems to recreate the WebUI with a generator.
https://github.com/FountainJS/generator-fountain-webapp

@emilevauge emilevauge added the kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. label Jul 22, 2016
@emilevauge emilevauge mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2016
Closed
@errm errm closed this as completed Nov 10, 2016
@ldez ldez removed the help wanted label May 10, 2017
@traefik traefik locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 1, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
kind/enhancement a new or improved feature. status/5-frozen-due-to-age
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@errm @ldez @emilevauge @traefiker