fix(validation): add validation schema for rich text nodes

[phoebeschmidt]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #152 into master will decrease coverage by 9.07%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #152      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.44%   79.37%   -9.08%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines        2060     2148      +88     
  Branches      229      242      +13     
==========================================
- Hits         1822     1705     -117     
- Misses        194      361     +167     
- Partials       44       82      +38

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...e-api/validator/schema/field-validations-schema.ts	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
src/bin/lib/steps-errors.ts	20.58% <0%> (-76.48%)	⬇️
src/lib/intent/entry-derive.ts	42.85% <0%> (-57.15%)	⬇️
src/lib/offline-api/validator/errors.ts	35.48% <0%> (-56.83%)	⬇️
.../lib/offline-api/validator/schema/fields-schema.ts	58.33% <0%> (-41.67%)	⬇️
src/lib/intent-validator/field-movement.ts	63.15% <0%> (-36.85%)	⬇️
src/lib/migration-chunks/validation/field.ts	61.8% <0%> (-36.65%)	⬇️
src/lib/intent/field-move.ts	65.51% <0%> (-34.49%)	⬇️
src/lib/intent/editorinterface-reset.ts	40% <0%> (-24.29%)	⬇️
src/bin/cli.ts	53.06% <0%> (-22.45%)	⬇️
... and 22 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 99b4976...32a725a. Read the comment docs.

[phoebeschmidt]

here decided to be very general, although AFAIK these are the possible validations in this case:
(object with size and message, object with linkContentType and message

{"nodes": {
	"embedded-entry-inline": [
              {
                "size": {
                  "min": 10,
                  "max": 20
                },
                "message": "this is a custom error for number of embedded inline entries"
              },
              {
                "linkContentType": [
                  "parent"
                ],
                "message": "we only accept parent"
              }
    ]
}

do you think I should go one level deeper with possible validations here?

[phoebeschmidt]

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.15.2 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀