You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Good day! I am glad that you released a new version of this software and wanted to clarify the results from tutorials I obtain.
I am particularly interested in QuerySeamVerticesSorted code. The only thing I have changed is I query MC_CONNECTED_COMPONENT_TYPE_SEAM instead of FRAGMENT expecting to get just seam of the intersection.
Given .off files from example I would expect getting two separate sequences of vertices, one for each part of the input mesh. However the result I obtain is the following:
Could you clarify what is the proper way to query the result I expect or the intuition behind the result I get. I have tried using FRAGMENTS to query the seam and then filter among all results, but it also has given me unreliable results.
Thank you once again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good day! I am glad that you released a new version of this software and wanted to clarify the results from tutorials I obtain.
I am particularly interested in
QuerySeamVerticesSorted
code. The only thing I have changed is I queryMC_CONNECTED_COMPONENT_TYPE_SEAM
instead ofFRAGMENT
expecting to get just seam of the intersection.Given .off files from example I would expect getting two separate sequences of vertices, one for each part of the input mesh. However the result I obtain is the following:
Could you clarify what is the proper way to query the result I expect or the intuition behind the result I get. I have tried using
FRAGMENTS
to query the seam and then filter among all results, but it also has given me unreliable results.Thank you once again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: