-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Returning success count from the .populate()
call
#1050
Merged
dimitri-yatsenko
merged 23 commits into
datajoint:master
from
ttngu207:populate_success_count
Oct 9, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
29357fe
add mechanism to return populate's success count
b737003
add test for populate returning `success_count`
d1011fb
improve docstring
6f7a0c0
fix `test_populate_with_success_count`
1f358a9
bugfix `test_populate_with_success_count`
eb827e6
black formatting
1b4806e
black formatting
0abd3c0
Merge branch 'master' into populate_success_count
6bf2afc
improve `populate` returns to be consistent with the input kwargs
37801d6
formatting
7a258d4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into populate_success_…
9480435
minor formatting
0f84560
Merge branch 'master' into populate_success_count
02127a0
Merge branch 'master' into populate_success_count
c061f8a
Merge branch 'datajoint:master' into populate_success_count
ttngu207 9ef2046
Merge branch 'datajoint:master' into populate_success_count
ttngu207 c66ff04
Merge branch 'datajoint:master' into populate_success_count
ttngu207 ff6b81c
update CHANGELOG
ttngu207 45938aa
`.populate()` call now returns a `dict` with `success_count` and `err…
e143ce8
Apply suggestions from code review
ttngu207 291a468
return `False` if nothing gets populated in `._populate1()`
008a723
minor code cleanup
18fd619
code cleanup - refactor `_populate1`
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is
processes == 0
handled? PerhapsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is handled in the
else
block