We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given a structured migrations setup with sub-namespaces, where migration class name looks like:
App\Migrations\SomeFeature\Version20180702173000
Where App\Migrations is the root migrations' namespace.
App\Migrations
The Status command only shows version number itself, not the class number + namespace.
The class above would be reported as:
Current Version: 2018-07-02 17:30:00 (20180702173000)
When using sub-namespaces, it'd be a good idea to output the namespace as well. Maybe printing the sub-namespace + class name would be ideal:
Current Version: 2018-07-02 17:30:00 (SomeFeature\Version20180702173000)
Also it's questionable whether it's desired to print version number formatted as a date like this as current version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe that this is solved in 3.x
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Bug Report
Summary
Given a structured migrations setup with sub-namespaces, where migration class name looks like:
Where
App\Migrations
is the root migrations' namespace.The Status command only shows version number itself, not the class number + namespace.
Current behavior
The class above would be reported as:
Expected behavior
When using sub-namespaces, it'd be a good idea to output the namespace as well. Maybe printing the sub-namespace + class name would be ideal:
Also it's questionable whether it's desired to print version number formatted as a date like this as current version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: