Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An improved debugging experience for Blazor WebAssembly apps #33728

Closed
Rick-Anderson opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

An improved debugging experience for Blazor WebAssembly apps #33728

Rick-Anderson opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor

Rick-Anderson commented Sep 26, 2024

@guardrex I couldn't find a dup. Do you own this?

author: daroth
Data types shown in the debugger now match the expected .NET data types. - Type members and member visibility use expected icons. - The displayed call stack is cleaned up to only shows the .NET call stack and correctly honors the Just My Code setting. - The modules window is now supported. - Expression evaluation support in the Immediate window and for watches and conditional breakpoints is expanded and improved. To enable the new debugging experience simply update your Blazor app to target .NET 9.

Internal only: blazor-wasm-debugger-improvements

@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll check on this; but because we mostly don't document tooling features, we might not be covering these ... they're just things that now work that didn't work before.

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll check on this; but because we mostly don't document tooling features, we might not be covering these ... they're just things that now work that didn't work before.

Maybe @ghogen is responsible and you review it?

@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator

guardrex commented Sep 26, 2024

I doubt it. Usually, absent tooling features just catch up in the background without any fanfare. If we had to say that something wasn't working, that gets called out. That's why I need to check those items to confirm that we didn't say anything about a broken/missing feature. Even if I don't find any doc changes to make, I can drop these remarks into the Migration article just to surface them.

@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator

guardrex commented Oct 7, 2024

I checked ... we're good here 👍. No changes to the coverage are required because these features failing to work in the past weren't covered by the article. Closing now.

@guardrex guardrex closed this as completed Oct 7, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 9.0 to Done in Blazor.Docs Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants