-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge release/dev17.12 to main #11047
Conversation
* Replace baseType token with a dedicated type * Track the generic portion of the baseType in the new type * Update the model portion of the baseType when the @model directive is used * Add tests + update baselines. --------- Co-authored-by: Fred Silberberg <[email protected]>
…e/Components/ComponentDocumentClassifierPass.cs Fixup bad merge
Cherry pick two fuse fixes back to 17.12
⚠ This PR has merge conflicts. @davidwengier |
@chsienki can you double check I merged this correctly? |
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ protected override void OnDocumentStructureCreated( | |||
{ | |||
// We don't want component imports to be considered as real component. | |||
// But we still want to generate code for it so we can get diagnostics. | |||
@class.BaseType = new BaseTypeWithModel("object"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original "object" version is actually correct. It was a weird merge back onto 17.12 where both me and Jan had edited the line, but only my change got back ported.
...osoft.CodeAnalysis.Razor.Compiler/src/Language/Components/ComponentDocumentClassifierPass.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…e/Components/ComponentDocumentClassifierPass.cs
Seems like you two are on top of this :) Thanks! |
This is an automatically generated pull request from release/dev17.12 into main.
Once all conflicts are resolved and all the tests pass, you are free to merge the pull request. 🐯
Troubleshooting conflicts
Identify authors of changes which introduced merge conflicts
Scroll to the bottom, then for each file containing conflicts copy its path into the following searches:
Usually the most recent change to a file between the two branches is considered to have introduced the conflicts, but sometimes it will be necessary to look for the conflicting lines and check the blame in each branch. Generally the author whose change introduced the conflicts should pull down this PR, fix the conflicts locally, then push up a commit resolving the conflicts.
Resolve merge conflicts using your local repo
Sometimes merge conflicts may be present on GitHub but merging locally will work without conflicts. This is due to differences between the merge algorithm used in local git versus the one used by GitHub.
git fetch --all git checkout -t upstream/merges/release/dev17.12-to-main git reset --hard upstream/main git merge upstream/release/dev17.12 # Fix merge conflicts git commit git push upstream merges/release/dev17.12-to-main --force