-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow suppressing nullability warnings in more ref scenarios #74498
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5ca85fb
Allow suppressing ref ternary operands
jjonescz 76cf2af
Allow suppressing the whole ref ternary
jjonescz f79dad9
Allow suppressing ref foreach
jjonescz fecd701
Use type inference for ref ternary nullability
jjonescz f1f76ff
Meet annotation and state
jjonescz 8f4e1d2
Move local function to the end
jjonescz 2b35639
Keep the states joined
jjonescz cbe141c
Test ref assignment
jjonescz 7fd64a4
Skip failing test
jjonescz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5772,6 +5772,11 @@ void makeAndAdjustReceiverSlot(BoundExpression receiver) | |
|
||
if (isRef) | ||
{ | ||
Debug.Assert(node is not BoundConditionalOperator { WasTargetTyped: true }, """ | ||
Unexpected ref target typed conditional operator. | ||
Should not do type inference below in this case. | ||
"""); | ||
|
||
TypeWithAnnotations consequenceLValue; | ||
TypeWithAnnotations alternativeLValue; | ||
|
||
|
@@ -5780,20 +5785,40 @@ void makeAndAdjustReceiverSlot(BoundExpression receiver) | |
(alternativeLValue, alternativeRValue) = visitConditionalRefOperand(alternativeState, originalAlternative); | ||
Join(ref this.State, ref consequenceState); | ||
|
||
var lValueAnnotation = consequenceLValue.NullableAnnotation.EnsureCompatible(alternativeLValue.NullableAnnotation); | ||
var rValueState = consequenceRValue.State.Join(alternativeRValue.State); | ||
|
||
TypeSymbol? refResultType = node.Type?.SetUnknownNullabilityForReferenceTypes(); | ||
if (IsNullabilityMismatch(consequenceLValue, alternativeLValue)) | ||
{ | ||
// l-value types must match | ||
ReportNullabilityMismatchInAssignment(node.Syntax, consequenceLValue, alternativeLValue); | ||
// If there is a mismatch between the operands, use type inference to determine the target type. | ||
BoundExpression consequencePlaceholder = CreatePlaceholderIfNecessary(originalConsequence, consequenceLValue); | ||
BoundExpression alternativePlaceholder = CreatePlaceholderIfNecessary(originalAlternative, alternativeLValue); | ||
var discardedUseSiteInfo = CompoundUseSiteInfo<AssemblySymbol>.Discarded; | ||
refResultType = BestTypeInferrer.InferBestTypeForConditionalOperator(consequencePlaceholder, alternativePlaceholder, _conversions, out _, ref discardedUseSiteInfo); | ||
|
||
// Report warning for each operand that is not convertible to the target type. | ||
var refResultTypeWithAnnotations = TypeWithAnnotations.Create(refResultType, lValueAnnotation); | ||
reportMismatchIfNecessary(originalConsequence, consequenceLValue, refResultTypeWithAnnotations); | ||
reportMismatchIfNecessary(originalAlternative, alternativeLValue, refResultTypeWithAnnotations); | ||
|
||
// Set "not null" top-level nullability. Consistent with equivalent method type inference or non-ref ternary scenarios. | ||
lValueAnnotation = NullableAnnotation.NotAnnotated; | ||
rValueState = NullableFlowState.NotNull; | ||
|
||
void reportMismatchIfNecessary(BoundExpression node, TypeWithAnnotations source, TypeWithAnnotations destination) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Consider moving the local function towards the end for method. We don't follow that guideline 100% but generally do. It helps keep the main flow of logic uninterrupted. #Closed |
||
{ | ||
if (!node.IsSuppressed && IsNullabilityMismatch(source, destination)) | ||
{ | ||
ReportNullabilityMismatchInAssignment(node.Syntax, source, destination); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
else if (!node.HasErrors) | ||
{ | ||
refResultType = consequenceRValue.Type!.MergeEquivalentTypes(alternativeRValue.Type, VarianceKind.None); | ||
} | ||
|
||
var lValueAnnotation = consequenceLValue.NullableAnnotation.EnsureCompatible(alternativeLValue.NullableAnnotation); | ||
var rValueState = consequenceRValue.State.Join(alternativeRValue.State); | ||
|
||
SetResult(node, TypeWithState.Create(refResultType, rValueState), TypeWithAnnotations.Create(refResultType, lValueAnnotation)); | ||
return null; | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -10890,7 +10915,8 @@ public override void VisitForEachIterationVariables(BoundForEachStatement node) | |
if (iterationVariable.IsRef) | ||
{ | ||
// foreach (ref DestinationType variable in collection) | ||
if (IsNullabilityMismatch(sourceType, destinationType)) | ||
if (node.Expression is not BoundConversion { Operand.IsSuppressed: true } && | ||
IsNullabilityMismatch(sourceType, destinationType)) | ||
{ | ||
var foreachSyntax = (ForEachStatementSyntax)node.Syntax; | ||
ReportNullabilityMismatchInAssignment(foreachSyntax.Type, sourceType, destinationType); | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels strange. In a scenario where we have
List<object?>?
vs.List<object>?
, why would we have a not-null annotation or state? #Closed