Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Detect Blazor WASM projects and add/update appropriate config to allow launching and debugging #3593
Detect Blazor WASM projects and add/update appropriate config to allow launching and debugging #3593
Changes from all commits
099cffd
0713ae5
93a1ba6
ed00e1e
274633d
70e367c
625191e
17fdf62
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Leaving this as the https variant given I assume we want that as the default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Technically it would be possible to infer the HTTPS port from
launchSettings.json
but 5001 is indeed the default.Inferring it doesn't make a huge difference because (1) the default is already correct, and (2) for a developer who's in the habit of changing it, once they've generated
launch.json
there would be nothing keeping it in sync with subsequent changes inlaunchSettings.json
.So basically I think this is fine!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good change. I was a bit concerned about people getting tripped up by
--no-build
before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Out of curiosity, why is this check important? I'd think the latter two checks would suffice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just following suite with how O# typically checks "is runnable web" project.