Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develco Electricity Meter Interface 2 (EMIZB-141) #7824

Closed
1 task done
aksdb opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7850
Closed
1 task done

Develco Electricity Meter Interface 2 (EMIZB-141) #7824

aksdb opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7850

Comments

@aksdb
Copy link

aksdb commented Jun 28, 2024

Is there already an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues and there is none for my device

Product name

Electricity Meter Interface 2

Manufacturer

Develco

Model identifier

EMIZB-141

Device type to add

Sensor

Node info

image

Endpoints and clusters

image

Basic

image

Further relevant clusters

Power Configuration

image

Poll Control

image

Simple Metering

image

(Here is an issue similar to the one reported for the previous device in ticket #4337: the pulse configuration, current summation and interface mode have the same IDs as unit of measure, multipler and divisor, making it impossible to read or adjust them.)

OTAU

image

Copy link
Contributor

As there has not been any response in 21 days, this issue has been automatically marked as stale. At OP: Please either close this issue or keep it active It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 21, 2024
@aksdb
Copy link
Author

aksdb commented Jul 21, 2024

I am still interested in a solution here. Especially to the problem, that I can't read or write the develco specific values in the Simple Metering Cluster, since their IDs are for whatever reason not unique.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant