Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drbd90-kmod at 9.1.x (and exlusive x86) #257

Open
zarganum opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

drbd90-kmod at 9.1.x (and exlusive x86) #257

zarganum opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@zarganum
Copy link

Dear team, two questions on drbd90-kmod:

  1. any reason to keep it on 9.1.x?
  2. any reason for vetoing the aarch64?

Starting from 9.2.6, DRBD replication now supports kernel-level TLS which might be essential for some environments.
Oracle is maintaining the ktls-utils which is just passed its experimental status.

I tried your spec unlocking the aarch64 (removed ExclusiveArch) and changing the Version to 9.2.11.
My express tests show it builds and works fine with TLS on 5.14.0-427.40.1.el9_4.aarch64 kernel.

@zarganum zarganum changed the title drbd90-kmod at 9.1.x drbd90-kmod at 9.1.x (and exlusive x86) Nov 13, 2024
@toracat
Copy link
Member

toracat commented Nov 13, 2024

  1. The 9.2.x branch has been published in the elrepo-testing repository. Regarding the 9.1.x branch, there will be 9.1.23 and that is supposed to be the last version. I plan to move 9.2.x to the main repository once 9.1.x comes to an end.

  2. We do not have proper hardware to build and maintain kmod packages for aarch64 at this moment.

@zarganum
Copy link
Author

@toracat, thanks for swift response

re: aarch64: just in case, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Free Tier provides 3000 always-free ARM CPU hours per month (which is 4-cores), plus 24Gb of RAM. You can split it by cores/gigs in any combinations.

@toracat
Copy link
Member

toracat commented Nov 13, 2024

@zarganum

We cannot build the packages that require our signing keys outside our build systems for security reasons.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants