-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GraphQL support should be a third party application. #619
Comments
|
|
Just commenting to add some updated links to libraries that can provide GraphQL support to Starlette applications. These will be in the Starlette documentation as well: |
Dead Link |
Updated link is here: https://strawberry.rocks/docs/integrations/asgi |
How easy would it be to replace the existing solution with any of the suggested alternatives? It looks like the current solution is quite strongly coupled to graphene, or am I wrong? The idea would be to output the schema as plain text or json to a third party library? I would gladly see even over-simplified example to appear in the documentation because its not clear to me how everything is interacting. For example I can see in strawberry's case that:
Seems like a problem since most people using starlette probably used graphene to generate their schema. I'm personally "stuck" with graphene as I used graphene-sqlalchemy, but maybe I missed a better option to interface my SQLAlchemy models with GraphQL. I found an example in Ariadne's documentation: Starlette integration where they use the string version of the schema (aka |
This issue can be closed as soon as we document our decision of deprecating our GraphQL module. |
It has been documented, we just haven't done a release in a while so the docs haven't been updated. |
I'd like our graphql support to move out into being a third party package.
We should then document:
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: