You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given the incongruency regarding the production readiness of Infima vs. Docusaurus, I would like to offer a Poll about which CSS Framework should be the default CSS Framework of Docusaurus.
Additionally, a recommendation to the Docusaurus Team. When launching a new Docusaurus project via CLI, please prompt the user to select their preferred CSS Framework to begin with. Please offer all 4 options listed in the poll.
Why is a Production-ready Documentation framework relying on a non-production ready CSS Framework, when there are well-adopted, popular CSS Frameworks already available?
(Especially considering Infima doesn't offer anything the others do not)
Infima: "not yet ready for production"
"Infima is not yet ready for production use and is being developed alongside Docusaurus 2"(https://infima.dev/)
Docusaurus 2: "ready for prime time", "ready for mainstream adoption"
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Poll: which CSS Framework should be the default for Docusaurus?
Infima is currently the CSS Framework used in Docusaurus, as of January 2024. It has 387 stars on Github, and is not production ready, based on its own claim on its website: "Infima is not yet ready for production use and is being developed alongside Docusaurus 2".
Given the incongruency regarding the production readiness of Infima vs. Docusaurus, I would like to offer a Poll about which CSS Framework should be the default CSS Framework of Docusaurus.
Additionally, a recommendation to the Docusaurus Team. When launching a new Docusaurus project via CLI, please prompt the user to select their preferred CSS Framework to begin with. Please offer all 4 options listed in the poll.
Why is a Production-ready Documentation framework relying on a non-production ready CSS Framework, when there are well-adopted, popular CSS Frameworks already available?
(Especially considering Infima doesn't offer anything the others do not)
Infima: "not yet ready for production"
"Infima is not yet ready for production use and is being developed alongside Docusaurus 2"(https://infima.dev/)
Docusaurus 2: "ready for prime time", "ready for mainstream adoption"
"the next generation of Docusaurus is ready for prime time."
"Docusaurus 2 is ready for mainstream adoption"
5 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions