Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update on issue #81 || Model generalisation problem. #584

Closed
albertsalgueda opened this issue Dec 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Update on issue #81 || Model generalisation problem. #584

albertsalgueda opened this issue Dec 23, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@albertsalgueda
Copy link

Hei!

Follow-up of this issue: #81

We have created several Robyn models and our customers are a bit worried about no train test split or cross-validation.

I agree with the fact that Ridge regression prevents overfitting, however, I am not sure it is enough. I wonder if Nevergrad should optimize towards R-squared in test data.

Even though it is a decomposition model, several functionalities regarding future estimates are key, and already implemented (i.e. Budget Allocator) So, there is a predictive utility in the model.

Customers prefer a model that can generalize, or at least we can prove it does.

Are you guys considering including that functionality again? Maybe as an option?
It would be very helpful!

Thank you for your amazing work; we are really happy with Robyn and hope to start using it soon.

@gufengzhou
Copy link
Contributor

It's just released. Please check https://github.com/facebookexperimental/Robyn/releases/tag/v3.9.0

@albertsalgueda
Copy link
Author

Amazing, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants