You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
I am testing LA-MCTS together with TuRBO-1 and found it works well. I tried to increase the batch_size in TuRBO-1 to reduce the time spent on GP fitting. From what I got, the TuRBO paper indicates this is a legit choice for increasing overall computational efficiency without affecting the quality of the results.
To this end, I only modified collect_samples() in MCTS.py to handle the multiple values returned by each TuRBO-1 iteration. Nothing particularly ambiguous here.
And now on rare occasion I get an AssertionError thrown at line 47 in update_kids() in Node.py:
Hello,
I am testing LA-MCTS together with TuRBO-1 and found it works well. I tried to increase the
batch_size
in TuRBO-1 to reduce the time spent on GP fitting. From what I got, the TuRBO paper indicates this is a legit choice for increasing overall computational efficiency without affecting the quality of the results.To this end, I only modified
collect_samples()
in MCTS.py to handle the multiple values returned by each TuRBO-1 iteration. Nothing particularly ambiguous here.And now on rare occasion I get an
AssertionError
thrown at line 47 inupdate_kids()
in Node.py:assert self.kids[0].classifier.get_mean() > self.kids[1].classifier.get_mean()
I'm not sure why just yet. And I don't understand why returning more samples from TuRBO-1 could trigger this.
Could you please indicate possible reasons for this?
I believe increasing
batch_size
in TuRBO-1 is something desirable and could benefit many.Or am I misunderstanding something in the interplay between LA-MCTS and TuRBO-1?
Thanks for the great algo!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: