You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on failure messages, I figured it means: the component should match 2 elements, and the text of each element should match the corresponding index in the array. My problem with this behaviour, is that it leads towards more specific assertions than I would like to make. When I want to say "my page should show these messages, but I don't care where", I try this:
myPage.shouldHave({text: ['must have numbers','must not have punctuation']});
...but that's not quite right, because myPage only matches one element. So I end up doing this:
myPage.find('.errors li').shouldHave({text: ['must have numbers','must not have punctuation']});
...but now my assertions are more coupled to the structure of the page than I would like. Currently that means I do:
It wasn't clear to me what this means exactly:
Based on failure messages, I figured it means: the component should match 2 elements, and the text of each element should match the corresponding index in the array. My problem with this behaviour, is that it leads towards more specific assertions than I would like to make. When I want to say "my page should show these messages, but I don't care where", I try this:
...but that's not quite right, because
myPage
only matches one element. So I end up doing this:...but now my assertions are more coupled to the structure of the page than I would like. Currently that means I do:
Is there a neater way to do this?
It strikes me that an alternative
shouldHave({ text: [] });
could do this instead:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: