Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Layer count is wrong when printing multiple object with "complete individual objects" enabled in Super Slicer #501

Closed
RobRobM opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #572
Labels
GH - Bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@RobRobM
Copy link

RobRobM commented Jan 31, 2022

What happened

I have printed multiple projects from Super Slicer today with 2 or more object completed individually and the layer count is wrong for all but one object.
layercount
.

What did you expect to happen

See the layer count of each individual object or the total number of layers of all object combined.

How to reproduce

Slice multiple objects in Super Slicer with "complete individual objects" enabled, print and watch the layer count.

Additional information

No response

@Biorn1950
Copy link
Contributor

Biorn1950 commented Feb 2, 2022

Hello, I think the total combination is the way to go.

@RobRobM
Copy link
Author

RobRobM commented Feb 2, 2022

I second that.

@Biorn1950 Biorn1950 added the GH - Bug Something isn't working label Feb 2, 2022
@matmen matmen added this to the Release: 1.18 milestone Feb 22, 2022
@matmen matmen modified the milestones: 1.18, 1.17.2 Mar 3, 2022
@pedrolamas
Copy link
Member

pedrolamas commented Mar 6, 2022

Arguably, we might want to look into not only showing the current and total layers, but also the current and total number of objects to print (having said that, we need to check if that is even possible!)

@pedrolamas
Copy link
Member

@RobRobM can you provide the gcode so we can repro this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GH - Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants