You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reference tasks are neverloaded till registration time and are nicer to work with.
but, often times it is desirable to simply construct a workflow by loading remote tasks. this can be done so
The problem with this approach is that this will cause the t1 to be loaded a module load time.
Goal: What should the final outcome look like, ideally?
it should be possible to lazy load tasks from remote.
t1=remote.fetch_task_lazy(....)
...
this should automatically load the task when used in a workflow at registration or local execution time.
Describe alternatives you've considered
NA
Propose: Link/Inline OR Additional context
No response
Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?
Yes
Have you read the Code of Conduct?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kumare3
added
enhancement
New feature or request
untriaged
This issues has not yet been looked at by the Maintainers
and removed
untriaged
This issues has not yet been looked at by the Maintainers
labels
Dec 20, 2022
Motivation: Why do you think this is important?
There are 2 ways today in which users can use remote tasks in flyte.
Reference tasks are neverloaded till registration time and are nicer to work with.
but, often times it is desirable to simply construct a workflow by loading remote tasks. this can be done so
The problem with this approach is that this will cause the t1 to be loaded a module load time.
Goal: What should the final outcome look like, ideally?
it should be possible to lazy load tasks from remote.
this should automatically load the task when used in a workflow at registration or local execution time.
Describe alternatives you've considered
NA
Propose: Link/Inline OR Additional context
No response
Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?
Have you read the Code of Conduct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: