Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why integration tests use 6.0.100 and 6.0.101 SDKs #2792

Open
xperiandri opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Why integration tests use 6.0.100 and 6.0.101 SDKs #2792

xperiandri opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@xperiandri
Copy link
Collaborator

I see integration tests use SDKs 6.0.100 and 6.0.101
@yazeedobaid @mclark1129 what should we do with that?
As these tests fail now on CI and I want to install the latest .NET 6 SDK on CI

@xperiandri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cc @TheAngryByrd @Numpsy @Thorium

@Numpsy
Copy link
Contributor

Numpsy commented Jul 30, 2024

I assumed the old versions are just because of how old the tests are, but not certain on that.

I at one point tried updating to the 6.0.300/6.0.301 SDKs in https://github.com/Numpsy/FAKE/commits/6.0.131/ and got other failures, but that was before before Paket and such were updated so maybe it was falling over those problems.

@Numpsy
Copy link
Contributor

Numpsy commented Jul 30, 2024

I got a successful CI build using the 6.0.30x SDK at #2794 at any rate, though I can't say if that's missing anything with regards to the intentions of the integration tests

@TheAngryByrd
Copy link
Contributor

TheAngryByrd commented Aug 6, 2024

So in general about feature bands

  • The .1xx is supported until the end of a major's lifecycle.
  • Additional feature bands such as .2xx .3xx .4xx are only supported specific months of that year.

So if we were trying to eliminate SDK as a source of bugs we would always need tests for the latest .1xx and the whatever is the latest of 2/3/4.

See: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/porting/versioning-sdk-msbuild-vs#lifecycle

@baronfel
Copy link
Contributor

baronfel commented Aug 6, 2024

I'm Commander Shepard Chet Husk and I approve this plan^

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants