You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To actually compare the rank change within a time frame we would need to switch the query to always only query for fixed set of holders (100 maybe?). We would then need to switch to the built-in pager, but this would require some effort if we still want the page number as a page param for browser history.
Then one could do a second query of top holders with a block-height that corresponds to the desired time-frame (chosen from a drop down). This would need to be a parameter of the page, separate cache etc.
Then getting the rank as index in the list and the previous rank by finding the account in the second list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To actually compare the rank change within a time frame we would need to switch the query to always only query for fixed set of holders (100 maybe?). We would then need to switch to the built-in pager, but this would require some effort if we still want the page number as a page param for browser history.
Then one could do a second query of top holders with a block-height that corresponds to the desired time-frame (chosen from a drop down). This would need to be a parameter of the page, separate cache etc.
Then getting the rank as index in the list and the previous rank by finding the account in the second list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: