Use MarkBag instead of MARK_BAG #501
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In GAP 4.9, the latter is an alias for backwards compatibility for the former.
|
Thanks @fingolfin, the second solution would probably be better, but is more work! I'll do it on the next refactoring of the kernel code. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In GAP 4.9, the latter is an alias for backwards compatibility for the former.
Alternatively, one could replace
TBipartObjMarkSubBagsbyMarkTwoSubBagsif one was willing to reorder the content ofT_BIPARTblocks so that the two subobject pointers come first, and the C++ pointer last (instead of first).