Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation: Material group or Organism (pack) #24

Open
MortenHofft opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Documentation: Material group or Organism (pack) #24

MortenHofft opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

It might be nice with clearer guidelines about when something is a group vs an organism, since the dwc example referenced for organisms also includes groups of animals, e.g. a pack of wolves. Perhaps it is clear when you sit with the data, but I think I would appreciate an example of where to draw the line

@tucotuco
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the line is pretty easy with Organism. A wolf pack in which there are no individually identified members is just an Organism with organismScope='pack'. There is no reason to make a MaterialGroup without the group having members. In the case where there is a pack and some individuals are identified, I think I would still always keep it in the context of an Organism - one for the wolf pack, one for each identified wolf, and an EntityRelationship between them. This would be robust against the community deciding not to model Organisms as MaterialEntities.

But then what are the characteristics of a MaterialGroup and when to use it. I think the simple answer is, "Whenever Organism can't work." Thus, MaterialGroup would work for a big catch in a trawl and for subsets of that catch divided by characteristics that are not characteristics of an Organism with scope larger than an individual, such as sex, lifeStage, reproductiveCondition, etc.

Does that help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants