You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Proposal to add a new Table 15 to the Taxonomy, to help distinguish nonstructural components (overall, at the building level) with significantly different damageability. In the list below, for example, a building with the former characteristics can be expected to sustain significantly less damage to the nonstructural components compared to a building with the latter characteristics:
restrained vs unrestrained freestanding cabinets
anchored vs unanchored electrical equipment
braced vs unbraced piping systems
Note that Porter (2005) proposes a more comprehensive taxonomy for nonstructural components, but here we require a simpler method that would apply at the building-level.
Proposal to add a new Table 15 to the Taxonomy, to help distinguish nonstructural components (overall, at the building level) with significantly different damageability. In the list below, for example, a building with the former characteristics can be expected to sustain significantly less damage to the nonstructural components compared to a building with the latter characteristics:
Note that Porter (2005) proposes a more comprehensive taxonomy for nonstructural components, but here we require a simpler method that would apply at the building-level.
Porter, K. A. (2005). A Taxonomy of Building Components for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. PEER Report 2005/03. URL: https://peer.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/peer_503_k._porter.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: