Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

Consider collapsing Relations section #144

Open
karenmajewicz opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Consider collapsing Relations section #144

karenmajewicz opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@karenmajewicz
Copy link
Member

The Relations section takes up a large portion of the view, but most records will only have one or two.

Could this be redesigned in the same way as the References section?

@ewlarson
Copy link
Contributor

ewlarson commented Jun 2, 2021

Have an example record at hand?

@karenmajewicz
Copy link
Member Author

Clarification: this is just for the GEOMG form editor view.

How many relations might be handy to test? For example, the dev GEOMG has this record with a single relation, Source: https://geomgdev.lib.umn.edu/documents/nyu_2451_34502/edit If we had a key - value looking type entry form, we could just select a Relation type and then enter the value as opposed to having each Relation type printed out on the form.

@karenmajewicz
Copy link
Member Author

Also, we can tackle it next month too.

@ewlarson
Copy link
Contributor

ewlarson commented Jun 2, 2021

Okok... I see what you mean here and how that would be much cleaner. I don't think this would be a trivial change. I'll think this over some to see what a path forward would look like.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants