Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Go: Make the models-as-data subtypes column do something more sensible for promoted methods #17618
Go: Make the models-as-data subtypes column do something more sensible for promoted methods #17618
Changes from all commits
91375d3
e46ec5a
e90e313
d9126d3
520acc4
20e8d48
17a3429
e290cec
fd40662
ccc525a
cd99bea
7ffff43
f61251c
4a1fce9
adc946e
e335737
ede3b9f
c2aee37
80e8015
39afb18
b2c2a94
8abb059
e813fa3
57192e8
b6a31b1
3986dff
6af5b55
d3a6452
13fb92a
fd4a6d4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I was wrong about this -- I think it's only Methods that can have multiple qnames like this, and field embedding is represented more explicitly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked into it and actually it is true for fields as well. In our code this is clear because Field.hasQualifiedName calls Type.getField, whose qldoc says "This includes fields promoted from an embedded field."