You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Authentik provides Django management commands for triggering an LDAP sync (implementend in authentik/sources/ldap/management/commands/ldap_sync.py). These can only trigger a full sync of the whole directory (which can take hours).
Describe the solution you'd like
The ideal solution would be to extend the ak ldap_sync - Command with parameters like $USER or $GROUP which triggers a limited sync of a specific user/group.
Describe alternatives you've considered
To not change a lot of code, another idea would be to have a script which creates a new LDAP source with a specific user or group bind to be synct and delete this source after the process.
Additional context
I would contribute this feature, since it is needed for our organization. Just wanted to know if I should consider to create a Pull Request for our implemented solution or not. As for as I can see, getting the ldap_sync to work with a single user or group isn't a small or trivial task, so I came up with a 'easier' solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Authentik provides Django management commands for triggering an LDAP sync (implementend in authentik/sources/ldap/management/commands/ldap_sync.py). These can only trigger a full sync of the whole directory (which can take hours).
Describe the solution you'd like
The ideal solution would be to extend the
ak ldap_sync
- Command with parameters like$USER
or$GROUP
which triggers a limited sync of a specific user/group.Describe alternatives you've considered
To not change a lot of code, another idea would be to have a script which creates a new LDAP source with a specific user or group bind to be synct and delete this source after the process.
Additional context
I would contribute this feature, since it is needed for our organization. Just wanted to know if I should consider to create a Pull Request for our implemented solution or not. As for as I can see, getting the
ldap_sync
to work with a single user or group isn't a small or trivial task, so I came up with a 'easier' solution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: