Support batch requests

[j-rewerts]

I found the update where batch updates were removed. Is there any interest in having this back?

I'm planning on using the Drive API to make tons of permission changes. Having this functionality would be nice.

[wellczech]

How many permission do you want to change (or how many API calls)? With good per account parallelism you can do a lot already. I'm currently making 1 250 000 Gmail API calls (7 different user accounts), takes about 6 hours to complete. Drive file metadata for 17K accounts (14M files) can be downloaded in 3 hours.

Batch requests doesn't help much with quotas. My only issue with such huge amount of request is that OS has issues with that number of connections. I'd be fine without batch requests, I'd rather see HTTP2 support in googleapis nodejs client.

[jelder]

I too am working on an app where batch requests would be desirable. We do a large number of GMail queries and batching would likely help avoid some concurrency problems for us.

[cb-lixar]

I don't know about their other APIs, but with their EMM APIs Google has recently added a clause in their public documentation that specifically states they do not want batch requests being made. Right now I'm having to look into queuing requests so they aren't made too often but this client does not seem to offer built-in rate limiting support.

[ace-n]

cc @erickoledadevrel

[wclr]

I need to go get info about 20-50 files with drive.file.get and without batch I have to do 50 requests, with a limitation of 1000 requests per 100 sec, I can handle this task only for more than 5 sec, it is quite long time for such simple task. Prior this I was using drive.newBatchRequest() and it worked like a charm in a sec.

Batch would be really helpful for such simple situations.

[wellczech]

@whitecolor In my experience API allows short bursts and it should be possible to get properties fast. Can you confirm, that user authentication is done before making API requests? I made mistakes that I've authenticated users with every request, but tokens are valid for an hour. So that's the first thing to check for me now.

Without knowing much about context, If I would need to check properties of same set of files in regular intervals, I'd add custom properties to hose files and then use drive.file.list with query to that property - I'll get all files of interest in one request.

Mostly, I'm using my custom library which wraps gapi-client into highland.js streams. Rate-limiting is fairly easy there. My library is not yet on github, but I'll release to general public. How much are you in hurry to solve this?

[wclr]

Well, I authenticate before each new bunch of requests.

1. My task is get full info about files in particular GDrive folder (folderId is given)
2. I have Service Account that is given access to the folder (Using Sharing)
3. So just before I need to get info about files in folder, I authorize using JSON web token (email and private-key)
4. Then I get file ids using drive.children.list({folderId, auth: jwtClient}) and then I have to make request for for each file using drive.files.get({fileId, auth: jwtClient}) (I need size, type, downloadUrl)

I believe can not get this with one drive.files.list, any suggestions how to optimize?

I'm using my custom library which wraps gapi-client into highland.js streams. Rate-limiting is fairly easy there.

How this can help to overcome platform restrictions for 1000 requests per 100 sec (or I believe almost the same 10 per 1 sec)?

[wellczech]

First of all, I suggest Drive API v3.

Only one request to file.list is needed. Request object: {q: "'[FOLDER_ID]' in parents"}. Good practise is to add 'fields' param to get back only properties you need - 'files(size,downloadUrl,mimeType)'.

[wclr]

@wellczech thank you very much for the advice that works for me perfect!

[j-rewerts]

Sorry for the late reply. I think if you're pulling metadata for 14 million files in 3 hours with no issues, I think I'll be okay. That amount of use isn't costing you anything? Or did you pay to boost your quota?

[wellczech]

Didn't pay anything. There are quotas per user and total quota for whole app. Key is to process multiple accounts in parallel and to have good error checking for failed requests. Listing of files can be done by thousands, so it's fast. If you are going to change permissions, it will take more time, because each permission change is one request. Also I suggest ordering accounts based on number of files you're going to update and start with accounts having most files - I usually process 98% of accounts in 2/3 of total time and rest of the time app processes just last few account with hundreds thousands files.

I use two approaches, either I buffer data in memory and then save JSON files to disk, this way I can hit quota limits easily (with 50-60% CPU usage). Recently I started to store data in SQLite, which seems to be bottleneck now (100% CPU, waiting for disk, but safer).

I'm thinking about using protobuffers and/or HTTP2 in hopes it will make API requests even faster.

[JustinBeckwith]

Greetings folks! Sadly, the global batch specific endpoints for googleapis have been turned down:
https://developers.googleblog.com/2018/03/discontinuing-support-for-json-rpc-and.html

Individual per-API batch methods still exist for many APIs, and those will continue to work just fine.

The real win here will be moving to HTTP/2, which we're tracking over in #1130. Thanks!

[jrmdayn]

Having hit the issue of batching Google apis requests using Node.js myself, I decided to develop a solution that follows the guidelines provided in Google's batching documentation, implementing the multipart/mixed HTTP request/response protocol.

Please have a look and do not hesitate to raise an issue if you find a bug or would like to discuss improvements.

[ticmaisdev]

who cares about quota, just fcking free my server from requesting multiple times