Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

Woodgrain backgrounds look dumb and skeumorphic #3569

Closed
timothyfcook opened this issue Jun 19, 2015 · 16 comments
Closed

Woodgrain backgrounds look dumb and skeumorphic #3569

timothyfcook opened this issue Jun 19, 2015 · 16 comments
Milestone

Comments

@timothyfcook
Copy link
Contributor

: )

Sorry, but I think the site design would come off a lot cleaner if the layer with the wood/pennies background was removed or altered. The pennies might be okay, but the wood-grain comes off all wrong.

@kzisme
Copy link
Contributor

kzisme commented Jun 19, 2015

Do you have any specific alteration suggestions? I like the idea of the penny personally - mainly because it represents a monetary denomination. The heart cut-out also works well for me - it makes even more sense after reading our (http://inside.gratipay.com/big-picture/mission) Mission Statement.

Other than that I'm not sure where the inspiration came from for the wood-grain. It could be re-vitalized I suppose

@timothyfcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah I think the wood-grain just happened to the context for the photo of the pennies that was taken.

I suggest either:

  • a digital animation of the heart-coins with no background
  • a new photo background that isn't set on top of wood

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

My biggest complain about background is the huge 200kB jpeg.

@kzisme
Copy link
Contributor

kzisme commented Jun 19, 2015

This may be considered completely off the wall, but if there is a push for a website re-design (whenever 2.0 releases) - I would like to see the color scheme stay the same, but using the heart-coin as a centerpiece.

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

Before pushing for the new design, I would enjoy exploring the archive of previous art. But.. we don't have any.

@kzisme
Copy link
Contributor

kzisme commented Jun 19, 2015

No previous art has existed, or is it just not archived?

@rohitpaulk
Copy link
Contributor

Everything that ever existed is archived, that's why we use version control. I guess what @techtonik is saying is that it's not in a readily viewable format (like a bunch of images).

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

@rohitpaulk yes. =)

@kzisme
Copy link
Contributor

kzisme commented Jun 19, 2015

Ah thanks for the clarification @rohitpaulk

@kzisme
Copy link
Contributor

kzisme commented Jun 19, 2015

@timothyfcook I suppose the wood grain was chosen since Ambridge used to be called Logstown - but that's a long-shot, and a lot of speculation 😆

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

Ideally the image archive should be clickable, like in InVision #3270

Web archive, unfortunately, was unable to get pages after user authorization https://web.archive.org/web/20140906122043/https://gratipay.com/

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

Dig through the blog, we have some posts there with old screenshots.

@timothyfcook
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just for fun, here's an ancient attempt at an un-used design sketch:

gittip mockup

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

!m @timothyfcook 💃

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre added this to the Redesign milestone Aug 10, 2015
@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

Yes! =)

@nobodxbodon
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #4268

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants