Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.

Teams should be able to give a percentage to other teams #4126

Closed
tswast opened this issue Sep 17, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Teams should be able to give a percentage to other teams #4126

tswast opened this issue Sep 17, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@tswast
Copy link

tswast commented Sep 17, 2016

I've been giving on Gratipay for years, but it wasn't until recently that I made a team for Who Goes First and am now receiving my first payments.

I love that Gratipay is pay-what-you-want, but I think this process could be improved. I as an individual can pay Gratipay (and have been for a while) because I think you are doing great work, but there is no way for a team itself to give to Gratipay what the team thinks the value it is receiving from Gratipay. I'd love to have Who Goes First be able to give 5% of what it receives to Gratipay.

It's not just Gratipay that teams could feel gratitude towards. ReadTheDocs is funded on Gratipay, I believe, and I am certain that other open source projects feel that they are providing value to them.

The reason I think it should be a percentage is that the value I receive from having Gratipay as a platform is relative to the amount I am given. Likewise, ReadTheDocs provides value relative to the community size that is using an open source package. The amount I receive is approximately proportional to the community size.

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 18, 2016

I see two separate ideas here (both good):

  • Teams giving to other teams
  • Giving as a percentage of income

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the feedback, @tswast ... and thanks for giving on Gratipay for years ... and for giving to Gratipay ❤️ ... and now for signing up for Gratipay with Who Goes First!💃 🙇 :-)

Seems like there's something to your idea. Certainly for Gratipay the value you receive from us is directly proportional to your income you receive through us, so it makes a lot of sense to express your payment to Gratipay as a percentage of your income (certainly this is the pricing model other payments and crowdfunding companies use ;). For something like Read the Docs (which hasn't made the jump to Gratipay 2.0 yet, I'm afraid), the connection is somewhat weaker, but I suppose it could make sense to let each team and/or user decide.

Do you think it'd be tenable to implement percentages to Gratipay as a one-off? Or do you see enough value in the model to generalize it?

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Sep 20, 2016

Do you think it'd be tenable to implement percentages to Gratipay as a one-off? Or do you see enough value in the model to generalize it?

I'd love to see teams-giving-to-teams generalized in order to encourage "trickle-down." Percentages would be even better...

If Team A uses Team B's product as part of Team A's OSS, then regardless of how much Team B receives directly, it's also now receiving more as Team A grows...encouraging further development. Gratipay-->Aspen would be an example.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

We'd want to think about how this interacts with team takes, where we opted for absolute instead of percentages (e.g.).

@tswast
Copy link
Author

tswast commented Sep 20, 2016

Who Goes First -> Weblate is another one that might make sense for giving a percentage, since I'm considering hosting a weblate server for translation and want to encourage development on that project.

That said, I think starting with a one-off for giving to Gratipay makes a lot of sense, since all teams on Gratipay benefit from that, whereas general team-team may only make sense for a few teams.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

chadwhitacre commented Sep 20, 2016

It's important to me for Gratipay to be "just like any other team project." I'd like to find a way to implement this by, e.g., exposing an API that any project could use, and have Gratipay use that API on gratipay.com itself.

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Dec 22, 2016

Until take-what-you-want returns for projects in general, there may not be a need for projects-giving-to-projects because all funds flow through the project owner, who can then give to the other project in question. I see the return of TWYW and PGTP as going hand in hand. Keeping the books straight if you ran multiple projects would be a reason to separate out PGTP before then.

https://gratipay.slack.com/archives/gratipay/p1482441691001211

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Dec 24, 2016

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

@mattbk Can we use http://gratipay.slackarchive.io/gratipay/ for Slack permalinks instead of slack.com? I'm given to understand that the former are more permanent.

@mattbk
Copy link
Contributor

mattbk commented Feb 17, 2017

+1 from https://twitter.com/wSokra/status/831828196681216000

@opencollect I want to donate to the mocha collective from the webpack collective. Is there a way to move funds without paying fees twice?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants