Hey there!

It could make sense, I think it would depend on what the implementation looks like. Would you be willing to discuss it here first? That could help save time before code is written :)

Thank you for the, dare i say, blazingly fast response :)

Sure. In my mind it could be implemented either via adding an Option<u64> compile_time_hash into Custom, with the hash implementation hijacked for the fast-hash case, or adding a new CustomStatic representation, which basically does the same, but is a separate type.
I don't really know yet how (and where) to hijack the hash, but i assume it should be doable in somewhat straightforward way; i'd need to dive a bit deeper into the project to figure it out, which i'm ready to do.

In both cases something like https://crates.io/crates/const-fnv1a-hash would be needed, too.

It's a fine thing to explore, but we'll want to weigh how much adding that affects performance of other parts. If it's much slower in other paths, we might not end up accepting the change.

I imagine we don't really need another dependency, the FNV algorithm is tiny and having the const fns in this repo would be fine (probably even removing the need for the fnv dependency in the first place).

I've got a draft for this, which right now apparently breaks dependent crates because of

error: to use a constant of type http::header::name::Repr<http::header::name::Custom> in a pattern, http::header::name::Repr<http::header::name::Custom> must be annotated with #[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]

Not really sure what this is about, but i guess there should be a workaround.

Benchmarks show a slowdown for header_name_from_static, which is expected, however other benchmarks are a surprise to me: https://pastebin.com/raw/N1Mqd7EE.
Everything header_map-related became faster, some benchmarks for other map implementations became substantially slower, and i have no clue why.

These results confuse me, and i would assume I've done something completely nonsensical if not for the tests passing; could you @seanmonstar please have a glance on this? - I don't request a review yet, more of a sanity check, and whether this direction has potential.

How do you define your company-wide standard headers in the code?

I'm asking because I think your issue is well connected with the issue #174 which was closed without any actions long time ago. But I think it's time for it.

My case is a C++-based one, and for me it goes like this, with the hash being calculated at compile time.
The most common headers we define within the framework itself, but nothing stops our users from declaring their own constexpr headers (and we do so internally)
@dmitrmax

Oh, I thought you are using this framework in Rust to define such headers, that is why I've asked. Because I use lazy_static to define them and this looks ugly since I have to dereference them when putting these headers into a request. This breaks common style when standard headers are mixed with the custom ones.

I think one should be able to declare const headers via HeaderName::from_static, so the functionality is there, and my question is rather about potential performance gains in that case

We are talking about different matters. Of course HeaderName::from_static should be used. But I'm rather talking about declaring a global constant. I don't see currenly any good way to declare and use it in the same manner as the standart headers can be used.