You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, @ajjimeno@bdwyer2@zhxgj@kmh4321@edwardleardi
Thank you so much for creating such a valuable dataset for the community! I have also studied your great work entitled "Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluation". I find that the proposed TEDS metric can optionally take cell content into consideration, i.e., evaluating either table structure recognition or table recognition. However, the results in the paper are only for table recognition task. Could you provide the corresponding "structure_only" TEDS scores in the following table? With these "structure_only" TEDS scores, we can have a more direct and fairer comparison on table structure recognition task, as the OCR engines used by different approaches are quite different. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, @ajjimeno @bdwyer2 @zhxgj @kmh4321 @edwardleardi
Thank you so much for creating such a valuable dataset for the community! I have also studied your great work entitled "Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluation". I find that the proposed TEDS metric can optionally take cell content into consideration, i.e., evaluating either table structure recognition or table recognition. However, the results in the paper are only for table recognition task. Could you provide the corresponding "structure_only" TEDS scores in the following table? With these "structure_only" TEDS scores, we can have a more direct and fairer comparison on table structure recognition task, as the OCR engines used by different approaches are quite different. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: