Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add FIPS Problem list placeholder #816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

llxia
Copy link
Contributor

@llxia llxia commented Oct 2, 2024

related: related: backlog/issues/1529, adoptium/TKG#620 and adoptium/aqa-tests#5662

related: related: backlog/issues/1529, adoptium/TKG#620 and adoptium/aqa-tests#5662
Signed-off-by: Lan Xia <[email protected]>
@llxia
Copy link
Contributor Author

llxia commented Oct 2, 2024

@JasonFengJ9 could you review? Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@LongyuZhang LongyuZhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@JasonFengJ9
Copy link
Member

ProblemList file changes, no PR build required.

@JasonFengJ9 JasonFengJ9 merged commit 64bd167 into ibmruntimes:openj9 Oct 2, 2024
2 checks passed
@JasonFengJ9
Copy link
Member

@llxia please port to other extension repos.

Usually the change starts at the head-stream - https://github.com/ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk

@llxia
Copy link
Contributor Author

llxia commented Oct 2, 2024

This PR is an example of FIPS customprofile-specific problem lists. They are just placeholders. I will leave it to @JinhangZhang to add the files and subtest excludes once the tests under javax/net/ssl is updated and ready to run with FIPS mode.

@llxia
Copy link
Contributor Author

llxia commented Nov 4, 2024

I do not think we need to add this change for JDK8. @JinhangZhang could you please confirm?

@JinhangZhang
Copy link
Contributor

Right, we dont need a placeholder for OpenJCEPlus for JDK8.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants