You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you mean by "other backdoored modules"? Thanks
When a module a uses a package subprocess directly, it is detected easily by static analysis. But when it imports perfect_hash, for static analysers it looks benign, they don't check interpackage control and data flows.
Can you explain in more detail why this is a security issue?
Not really a security issue within the package itself. It is more that python interpreter is flawed. I have an idea how to make it better, but any manual overrides of taints (absolutely necessary for practiaclly useful modules) will make all the proofs unsound.
The mere presence of a module importing
subprocess
is a security issue because other backdoored modules can use it to evade static analysisThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: